Historiography, Authoritarianism, and the Formation of Political Culture in Indonesia: Post-1965 Historiography and the Legacy of the New Order

Authors

  • Yusron Ihza Universitas Indonesia
  • Linda Sunarti Universitas Indonesia
  • Didik Pradjoko Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i3.811

Keywords:

Authoritarianism, Collective Memory, Historiography, Political Culture, 1965 Crisis

Abstract

Background: The 1965 political crisis marked a critical turning point in Indonesian history, shaping political culture and state–society relations. Although previous studies have examined political violence and regime consolidation, limited attention has been paid to how historiography normalized authoritarian values and political authority across generations.

Objective: This study aims to analyze how historical narratives surrounding the 1965 crisis contributed to the formation and persistence of authoritarian political culture in Indonesia.

Methods: This research employs a qualitative historical approach combined with historiographical analysis. Data were collected from historical archives, state narratives produced during the New Order period, historiographical literature, and scholarly works discussing political culture and authoritarian legacies in Indonesia. The data were analyzed using thematic discourse analysis to identify recurring political concepts embedded within official narratives.

Results: The findings indicate that post-1965 historiography functioned not merely as a form of historical interpretation but also as an instrument of political legitimization. Specifically, state-sanctioned educational materials, such as the mandatory school curriculum portraying the PKI as a national threat, and the compulsory screening of Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI, reinforced hierarchical political norms. Narratives emphasizing stability, national unity, and anti-communism contributed to the construction of hierarchical political relations and the limitation of political pluralism. Furthermore, these political ideas continued to influence public trust, political participation, and perceptions of authority even after the democratic transition that followed the fall of the New Order regime in 1998.

Conclusion: This study shows that historiography shapes political culture beyond regime change by sustaining authoritarian legacies through collective historical memory.

References

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (2015). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations.

Corner, J. (2003). Political Culture’. Media and the Restyling of Politics. Consumerism, Celebrity and Cynicism, Eds. John Corner and Dick Pels (London: Sage, 2003), 67–84.

Dalton, R. J., & Welzel, C. (2014). Political culture and value change. The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens, 1.

Fikrat, D. V. (2025). The impact of authority on political culture in non-democratic regimes.

Gramsci, A. (2020). Selections from the prison notebooks. In The applied theatre reader (pp. 141–142). Routledge.

Hearman, V. (2018). Unmarked graves: Death and survival in the anti-communist violence in East Java, Indonesia. nus Press.

Kane, A. (2000). Reconstructing culture in historical explanation: Narratives as cultural structure and practice. History and Theory, 39(3), 311–330.

Lewis, D. (2013). Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2013.818767

McGregor, K. (2018). The world was silent?: Global communities of resistance to the 1965 repression in the Cold War era. In Truth, Silence and Violence in Emerging States (pp. 147–168). Routledge.

Melvin, J. (2018). The army and the Indonesian genocide: Mechanics of mass murder. Routledge.

Mietzner, M. (2018). Fighting illiberalism with illiberalism: Islamist populism and democratic deconsolidation in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 91(2), 261–282.

Neundorf, A., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2020). Dictators and their subjects: Authoritarian attitudinal effects and legacies. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1839–1860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020926203

Payne, R. A., & Samhat, N. H. (2004). Democratizing global politics: Discourse norms, international regimes, and political community. Suny Press.

Pernia, R. A. (2022). Authoritarian values and institutional trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from the Philippines. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121992118

Pocock, J. G. A. (2011). Historiography as a form of political thought. History of European Ideas, 37(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.09.002

Pye, L. W., & Verba, S. (2015). Political culture and political development.

Robinson, G. (2018). The killing season: A history of the Indonesian massacres, 1965-66. Princeton University Press.

Roosa, J. (2006). Pretext for Mass Murder: the September 30th Movement and Suharto’s coup d’état in Indonesia. Univ of Wisconsin Press.

Sutiyo, & Maharjan, K. L. (2017). Historical Background of Decentralization in Indonesia. In Decentralization and Rural Development in Indonesia (pp. 1–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3208-0_1

Touseef, M., Khan, B. B., Ali, S., Abbas, H. N., & Raza, A. (2023). The influence of cultural values and norms on political attitudes and behavior: A sociological study. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(2), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.31098/aqr.v1i2.1744

Zurbuchen, M. S. (2005). Historical memory in contemporary Indonesia. Beginning to Remember: The Past in the Indonesian Present, 3–32.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08