AR Module Development for Reading Comprehension: An Ethno-Meaningful Learning Needs Analysis

Authors

  • Atika Zikri Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Afnita Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Syahrul Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Nursaid Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i3.789

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Ethno-Meaningful Learning, Minangkabau, Needs Analysis, Observation Report Text, Reading Comprehension

Abstract

Background: Indonesian students’ reading comprehension proficiency remains a critical challenge, as evidenced by Indonesia’s ranking of 71st among 81 participating countries and economies in PISA 2022, with a reading score of 359, substantially below the OECD average.

Objective: This study presents a needs analysis as the foundational phase in developing an interactive augmented reality (AR) module based on Ethno-Meaningful Learning to improve senior high school students’ reading comprehension of observation report texts.

Methods: Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document analysis involving nine Indonesian language teachers and 34 students at SMA Pembangunan Padang.

Results: The results reveal significant gaps between current learning conditions and ideal learning requirements: (1) 88.9% of teachers still rely on conventional, text-based instruction; (2) 82.5% of students find reading lessons unmotivating; (3) 94.1% of students have never experienced AR-based learning; and (4) 100% of teachers confirmed the absence of interactive digital modules integrating local Minangkabau culture. A gap analysis across five dimensions (methods, media, content, technology, and literacy) confirms the urgent need for an innovative, culturally grounded, and technology-enabled learning solution.

Conclusion: These findings substantiate the need to develop an interactive AR-based module that integrates Ethno-Meaningful Learning principles to enhance students’ literal, inferential, and critical comprehension of observation report texts. This study contributes a culturally grounded and empirically validated framework for developing AR-based reading modules, thereby advancing the integration of ethnopedagogy and educational technology into Indonesian language instruction.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.

Ausubel, D. (2010). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive view.

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.

Branch, R. M., & Varank, İ. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Dewi, P., & Afnita, A. (2019). Korelasi Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Dengan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Berita Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 7 Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia UNP, 8(2), 59–65.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th). New York: Longmann.

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.

Harahap, A. A. (2025). Transformasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Era Kurikulum Merdeka: Kajian Literatur Kritis terhadap Pendekatan Literasi Kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(2), 17999–18007.

Hotimah, D. H. (2022). Teks Laporan Hasil Observasi & Teks Eksposisi. Guepedia.

Hsu, K.-C., & Liu, G.-Z. (2021). Investigating effects and learners’ perceptions of a student-led, AR-based learning design for developing students’ English speaking proficiency. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(3), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2021.116519

Indrayadi, T. (2021). Indonesian EFL Learners’ Reading Motivation. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 335–346.

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Laporan hasil Asesmen Nasional Berbasis Komputer (ANBK) tahun 2023. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1863883

Laia, E. (2023). analisis struktur teks laporan observasi siswa kelas x sma negeri 2 susua tahun pelajaran 2021/2022. Kohesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.57094/kohesi.v3i2.848

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge university press.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.

Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244

Parmaxi, A., & Demetriou, A. A. (2020). Augmented reality in language learning: A state‐of‐the‐art review of 2014–2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12486

Putri, R. M., & Fitri, M. N. (2025). Development of E-Physics Teaching Material Integrated with Augmented Reality and Ethno-Meaningful Learning to Promote Students’ 21st Century Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(7), 1172–1185. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.12214

Sudarmin, S., Zahro, L., Pujiastuti, S. E., Asyhar, R., Zaenuri, Z., & Rosita, A. (2019). The development of PBL-based worksheets integrated with green chemistry and ethnoscience to improve studentsâ€TM thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 492–499.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.

Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia tahun 2018 turun dibanding tahun 2015. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8g7kp

UNESCO. (2023). Digital literacy for sustainable development: Global framework for reference and action. UNESCO Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.

Wahidmurni, W., Susilawati, S., & Abidin, A. A. (2024). Resistance to Curriculum Changes among Teachers of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah in Indonesia. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v9i1.4300

Wijaya, H. P., Tias, S. A., & Win, S. S. (2026). Dialogic Reading in Intensive Reading Lessons: Indonesian Secondary EFL Teachers’ Perspectives. New Language Dimensions, 7(1), 58–71.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24