Evaluation of the Net Benefits of Using a Logistics Transportation Monitoring Application for PT. XYZ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i3.775Keywords:
Application performance, Information System, DeLone and McLean model, SmartPLS, Information Quality, Net BenefitsAbstract
Background: PT. XYZ is a telecommunications company that provides telecommunications network support and maintenance services. The company experienced disruptions in its logistics processes, resulting in losses equivalent to 60% of its total logistics costs. Because PT. XYZ had difficulty monitoring material deliveries, an information system in the form of a logistics transportation monitoring application was developed. However, the application has been operational for only six months. Infor mation systems (IS) have become an increasingly important field of study in business organizations because of the need to better understand the value generated by information and information technology.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the success and net benefits of PT. XYZ’s Logistics Transportation Monitoring Application.
Methods: This study employed a quantitative approach by surveying 133 application users. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS to identify the factors influencing application use, user satisfaction, and net benefits. The DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model was used as the theoretical framework.
Results: The hypothesis-testing results show that information quality and system quality have positive effects on user satisfaction. System quality and service quality positively affect application use, while user satisfaction and application use positively affect the net benefits of the Logistics Transportation Monitoring Application.
Conclusion: The evaluation based on the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model and PLS-SEM analysis using SmartPLS, with data from 133 respondents, shows that seven of the nine proposed hypotheses are supported. User satisfaction and application use are the primary drivers of the net benefits generated by the Logistics Transportation Monitoring Application.
References
Abrego Almazán, D., Sánchez Tovar, Y., & Medina Quintero, J. M. (2017). Influence of information systems on organizational results. Contaduría y Administración, 62(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.03.001
Almarashdeh, I. (2016). Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in distance learning course. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 249–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.013
Alshahrani, S. M., Mohamed, H., Mukhtar, M., & Mokhtar, U. A. (2023). The adoption of the e-portfolio management system in the Technical and Vocational Training Corporation (TVTC) in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(1), 100148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100148
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
Baraka, H. A., Baraka, H. A., & El-Gamily, I. H. (2013). Assessing call centers’ success: A validation of the DeLone and Mclean model for information system. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 14(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2013.03.001
Chatterjee, S., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2018). Success of IoT in Smart Cities of India: An empirical analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.002
Chin, W. (2000). Partial least squares for IS researchers: an overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach. ICIS, 2000, 741–742.
Chiu, C., Chiu, C., & Chang, H. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271–287.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek taxation information system. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 47–56.
Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2003). Enterprise Systems Success: a Measurement Model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2003, 576–591.
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207–228.
Halawi, L. A., McCarthy, R. V., & Aronson, J. E. (2007). An empirical investigation of knowledge management systems’ success. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646014
Heo, J., & Han, I. (2003). Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: an empirical investigation. Information & Management, 40(4), 243–256.
Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8–27.
Jayakrishnan, M., Mohamad, A. K., & Abdullah, A. (2019). Journey of an enterprise architecture development approach in Malaysian transportation industry. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol, 8(4), 765–774.
Jeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical meta-review and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139
Kartika, M., & Heny, D. R. (2020). The effect of system quality, information quality, and perceived playfulness on the use of transportation online application.
Kim, L. S. (2015). Convergence of Information Technology and Corporate Strategy. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(6), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2015.6.6.017
Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015). Validating the Conceptual Model for Predicting Intention to Use as Part of Information System Success Model: The Case of an Indonesian Government Agency. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.150
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 236–263. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information and Management, 46(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
Roky, H., & Meriouh, Y. Al. (2015). Evaluation by Users of an Industrial Information System (XPPS) Based on the DeLone and McLean Model for IS Success. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26(0), 903–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00903-x
Sánchez‐Franco, M. J., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal‐directed and experiential web users. Internet Research, 15(1), 21–48.
Sardjono, W., Kristin, D. M., Putra, G. R., Salim, G., & Subiyantoro, S. (2022). Evaluation Model of Yachters Information System Implementation Success Using Delone and Mclean To Increase Organization Performance. ICIC Express Letters, 16(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.24507/icicel.16.02.205
Solano Rodríguez, O. J., García Pérez De Lema, D., & Bernal García, J. J. (2014). Influence of the implementation of information systems on performance in small and mid-sized enterprises: An empirical study in Colombia. Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad Del Valle), 30(52), 31–43.
Straub, D. (1989). Validating research instruments. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(2), 147–169.
Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
Varajão, J., & Carvalho, J. Á. (2018). Evaluating the success of IS/IT projects: How are companies doing it?
Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733.
Zhang, K., Qian, Y., He, J., & Cao, F. (2021). Construction and analysis of the user satisfaction evaluation system for Baidu Scholar. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102435
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dimas Putri Pratiwi, Jarot S. Suroso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



